Puzzling referrals
Wednesday 25 February 2009 - Filed under Plants
A lot of people get the benefit of funny analytics about how people arrive at their site, they find that someone googled “is my grandpa a ninja?,” but not me. My analytics reveal exceptionally straight laced hard core gardening nerds like me. I guess as quirky as it gets is “shoes in closet,” which gets a surprising number of searches that leads people to an out of focus iPhone photo of my closet, and the occasional “sewing room.” My typical search terms, though, look like this.
- kalanchoe thyrsiflora
- rhus typhina tiger eyes
- choisya ternata aztec pearl
- sutherland gold elderberry
- pittosporum tobira
That part is not surprising. What does surprise me is that my highest hit flickr photos are a) pictures I questioned making public at all because they’re not good, but b) don’t seem like the kind of plants that would top the popularity charts.
My most popular, clockwise from top left below: 1) It was too sunny for a good picture in the case of the cutleaf staghorn sumac. 2) The mexican orange ‘aztec pearl’ picture is just a sorry small one in my yard that I just took for my own inventory. 3) My highest hit New Zealand Flax picture is completely out of focus, I don’t remember why I posted it. 4) Pittosporum tobira ‘Wheeler’s Dwarf’ is a fine little plant, but it gets a lot more action than I would expect for something so plain.
I see trends in popular plants, at least among my own sets, and every once in a while, something that has been long ignored will get a run and make a come from behind victory of sorts, and I find myself rooting for my favorites. Does that make my life sound sad? Instead of sports, I’m making imaginary games out of flickr stats. I am a lot of fun at parties. But, making a move and securing second place, a picture of the gorgeous Sambucus racemosa ‘Sutherland Gold.’ That’s a plant worth the attention. This one, the best I’ve ever seen in real life, sadly is not mine. This one appears to have been hard pruned, which produces the best leaves. I let mine grow into a shrub, and the leaves were small and unimpressive. It had grown very tree like with a single leader trunk. I fully intended to cut it to the ground in January, but forgot until I saw it starting to leaf out last weekend, and then cut it down. I may have killed it, but that’s pretty hard to do with elderberries in this region. Even if it doesn’t make it, it was worth the risk in the hopes that it grows up to be like this one.
2009-02-25 » megan





25 February 2009 @ 1:31 pm
Do you have a program that you dump your terms into? I was just saving mine in a Word file for a while but then got lazy and stopped. It is curious to see how people arrive. Since you’re good about including botanical names and featuring interesting plants, it’s not surprising you get lots of hits, however modest you feel about the photo quality (all look fine to me, BTW). As for parties, I am not too into those but if I found a person to talk plants/gardens with, that would make my evening!
25 February 2009 @ 3:17 pm
Maybe people are clicking to better see leaf detail or something. But Flickr views make no sense. One of my most-viewed photos is an unlabeled picture of me standing in no remarkable scenery and looking like a tool. Where do people even find it? I don’t know. It’s a little creepy. At least your stalker victims are plants.
26 February 2009 @ 6:26 am
Why don’t you have a profile on your blog? I really like your posts, but it makes me want to know more about you and where you live and grow your plants.That’s the great thing about plant blogs – I can learn which plants grow in different geographic reasong and which ones don’t.
26 February 2009 @ 7:57 am
You’d rather have those terms than what I get:
“flaccid dicks”
Seriously.
And no! I’ve never wrote a post about that.
26 February 2009 @ 9:27 am
Karen – I don’t do anything anymore with my analytics. I get distracted by the numbers, and get sad when I see them trend down, so I just ignore them. But for web projects for clients, I usually just recommend they us google analytics, and you can go back and look at analytics for different periods of time.
Erin – It’s true, flickr views are completely random. Compared to yours, my stats are downright logical.
Tim – good point, figured nobody cared, but I figured wrong. It’s homework, I’ll get on it.
Chris – But then you at least have good stories to tell. That’s what I mean. I get none of that.